E-FACTS — E-receipt management companyE-FACTS — E-receipt management company
Product

Writing for product

Tone, jargon rules, and how we talk about E-FACTS to execs and shoppers

Writing for product

Words are part of the product. Prefer clarity over cleverness.

Audiences

AudienceToneAvoid
Exec / founderShort, outcome-first, one metricImplementation digressions
Shopper (in-app)Plain, calm, actionableInternal codenames, API talk
Retail partnerPrecise, integration-awareHype without contracts
Engineers (specs)Explicit flows + dataVague “delight”

Company voice

  • Accurate — do not claim eco impact you cannot source.
  • Direct — lead with the job (“Find your receipt”), not the stack.
  • Respectful of money — currency formatting is a trust signal (tabular-nums).
  • Human — returns and warranties are stressful; copy should reduce anxiety.

Jargon rules

Instead of…Prefer…
“Leverage our POS ingestion pipeline”“Your store receipt shows up in the app”
“UCI bind orchestration”“Link your receipt ID” (then explain what you need)
“Omnichannel wallet synergies”Say nothing — rewrite the sentence

Internal docs may use precise terms (UCI, JWT, snake_case) when the audience is engineering — still define them once.

UI copy checklist

  • Verb-first buttons (“Save receipt”, not “Receipt submission”)
  • Error states say what happened and what to do next
  • Empty states teach the next action
  • Eco / ESG strings cite a real field or are removed

Docs on this site

  • Product section: company-readable, link out for code depth.
  • Engineering section: deep enough for implementers; still skimmable at the top.
  • Never paste secrets, tokens, or production credentials into MDX.

On this page